What to do

Separate extraction status from review status. A completed result may still contain an unreadable reference or unresolved total. Give each held record a reason, an owner, and the next action so exceptions do not disappear inside a successful batch count.

The queue described here is a review worksheet, not an automatic Parzable approval-routing feature.

Two worked review cases

These cases are fictional teaching data, not measured extraction results. Use the source excerpts to practise deciding what belongs in the reviewed output.

CaseFictional source excerptReview decision
Missing evidenceExtraction complete; invoice number clipped in sourceHold for a replacement source, with an assigned follow-up owner.
Corrected recordReviewer confirms a misread decimal against the originalRecord the correction and mark ready only after required checks pass.

Suggested review columns

ColumnDefinition or instruction
Review statusReady, held, or not yet reviewed in your worksheet.
Exception reasonSpecific unresolved field or source issue.
Owner and next actionResponsible reviewer and evidence needed to proceed.

These are suggested staging-sheet columns. Printed facts can inform field descriptions in Parzable’s Schemas view; source references, review statuses, and decisions must be supplied by your own review process.

A practical review sequence

  1. Define clear review statuses before processing the batch.
  2. Record field-level exception reasons instead of generic Failed notes.
  3. Reconcile ready and held records with the complete source set before handoff.

Errors to avoid

  • Do not equate Completed in the extractor with Approved in your review process.
  • Do not clear a hold merely because the file can be opened.

Use the case worksheet with a small sample

Download this page’s worked-case worksheet. It contains the two fictional cases above and a blank row for your own review exercise. Keep any real source documents in your agreed storage process.

For the broader product workflow, see the related guide. Parzable accepts PDF/image inputs and downloads CSV. Suggested structures here are review targets; nested item rows, automatic approvals, and destination integrations are not guaranteed.

Reference and scope

Further reading: CSV import and type handling: Microsoft Support. External documentation provides background for the topic; it does not establish Parzable’s implementation or performance. References checked 18 October 2026.

Examples and review decisions on this page are authored illustrations. Confirm unresolved business, payment, or accounting decisions through the responsible reviewer.

Put the workflow to work

Try your own invoice in Parzable

Create an account, define a schema, and test a small sample. Review extracted values before using them. See current plans and page allowances.

Try Parzable